What urban issues remain unaddressed in this situation, given the outcome?

Can you think of any reasons why some folks might prefer to live in an encampment than accommodation like shelters or temporary hotels?

From this case study, name 1 stakeholder group at the "top" and one stakeholder group that may be at the "bottom" when thinking of top down vs. bottom up

What role did planning play in this case and how does it connect to the conflict at hand?

What does this case study say about Toronto's phrase, "Diversity is our Strength"?

Name 1 way a planner could facilitate breaking down an "Us vs. Them" mentality that the public often possesses in these cases.

What actions should be taken by local authorities/planners to ensure a more humane and equitable approach to supporting the unhoused population? To what extent do municipalities, planners and social organizations have power over this matter?

How can planners ensure that community members, including underrepresented groups, are involved in the decision-making processes?

Given planners' position at the "top", how could they ensure reconciliation practices are considered in cases like this?