100 - Do you agree with Beitz, ie, Human Rights are international because when they're broken, external actors have to intervene?

Are human rights truly universal or are they essentially arbitrary? Is there an element of cultural bias to them?

Is a world court the best way to deal with "silent and continuous violence" in an effective way, as per Alston?

200-Can human rights exist without a state to uphold and/or enforce them? Would they exist if a world government existed?

Are 'zero-based goals' incompatible with the idea of universality?

What would an ideal world court look like vs. a real-world world court?
How would sub-state actors be dealt with?

300-Do human rights protect an individual's ability to flourish or do they only protect and uphold the minimal, basic rights?

Which is more important in human rights, universality or difference?

600-What does global justice look like?

400-Do human rights need egalitarian distribution of resources or egalitarian distribution of opportunities?

Do human rights need to view all people as being equal in order to be fair?

1200-Should Will Smith be a judge in the world court?