Sample | Experiment | Background | Results/Findings | Miscellaneous |
---|---|---|---|---|
What is Volunteer, Opportunity, and Random Selection?
The sampling method
|
What is a lab, natural (autistic group), and questionnaire experiment?
The research method
|
What is the "Reading the mind in the eyes" test?
The test Baron Cohen developed in 1997
|
Females scored higher on the R-ET
Males scored higher on the AQ test (Researchers said the sample was not large enough)
Two of the prediction's results were not significant
|
What is High Functioning Autism, Asperger Syndrome, and Tourette Syndrome?
HFA; AS; TS
|
What is Group 1 (IQ 115) and Group 4 (IQ 116)?
(created a control and allowed for a comparison)
The two groups that were matched
|
What is 5 out of 8 judges?
For the foils to be used, a specific amount of judges had to agree
|
What is the ability to attribute different mental states to oneself or others
(Stage 1: being able to attribute different mental states...Stage 2: being able to infer content related to the mental state)
The Theory of Mind
|
What is inversely correlated? (Those that scored higher on the AQ test scored lower on the Eyes Test and vice versa.
The AQ and Eyes Test were ___ correlated
|
What is a quiet room at Cambridge?
(Artificial lab setting; lacks ecological validity)
The place the test was administered
|
What is the lack of generalizability? What is a small sample of AS (15 adults of similar adults)?
Weakness of sample
|
-To test a group of adults with AS or HFA in order to check if the same deficit had been found in the original test and related tests could be replicated.
-To test if in a sample of normal adults an inverse correlation could be found with performance on the test and the Autism Spectrum quotient (AQ) -To see if the sex difference (female superiority) found on the original version of the test could be replicated
The 3 aims
|
Problem 1: 2 word choices caused the ceiling effect
Problem 2: Narrow range of items, didn't allow differentiation between groups Problem 3: Ceiling effect Problem 4: Items to easy because they included basic emotions Problem 5: Photos easily guess because of direction of eye gaze Problem 6: More female faces Problem 7: Words were semantic opposites (unhappy & happy), therefore too easy to guess Problem 8: Words not understood by participant
The old test had to be revised because there were many problems, name them
|
Worse, all.
(AS/HFA- 21.9, G2- 26.2, G3- 28, G4- 30.9)
The AS/HFA groups performed ___ than ___ group(s) on the Eyes test.
|
Pilot tests showed that “normal” adults achieved 100% when identifying gender.
The experimenters chose not to have the normal adults complete the gender recognition task (explain why)
|
What is the lack of withdrawing? (as they volunteered) What is large numbers acquired easily?
Strength of sample
|
What is independent measures? ; Someone with autism can't be tested with the "normal" adults
Research method, and explanation
|
What is error? (recognizing error allowed them to revise the problems developing a better "eyes" test.
The results from the original test were significant...explain
|
-AS/HFA adults are significantly impaired in identifying social interaction cues.
-The results of the study also demonstrated that the R-ET is useful in identifying impairments related to AS/HFA.
2 conclusions from the study
|
What are complicated emotions (differing from basic emotions such happy and sad)?
What is problem 4? (without complex mental states, it was easy to recognize emotion, complexity allows the test the ability to prove the results were directly affected by the questionnaire & attempted to eliminate guessing).
Define "Complex mental states", state what problem it is discussed in
|
What is:
Group 1: 15 male adults with AS/HFA, mean IQ of 115 Group 2: 122 normal adults, ranges of education and occupations Group 3: 103 undergraduate students, 50 female & 53 males with high IQ's Group 4: 14 randomly selected individuals from general population, IQ matched with group 1 (IQ 116)
The 4 participant groups used in the study
|
1. The AS/HFA group will score lower on the Eyes test than all other groups participating.
2. The AS/HFA group will score higher on the AQ than all other groups participating. 3. “Normal” females will score higher than males on the Eyes Test 4. - “Normal” males will score higher than females on the AQ 5. - Scores on both AQ and the Eyes Test would be inversely correlated.
The 5 predictions
|
Not including the "full picture" limits how one determines emotional states. (the second attribution; inferring the content of that mental state)
The Eyes test does not include something
hint; the second state of attribution |
What is no correlation?
There was __ correlation between the Eyes test and IQ test or between the AQ and IQ test.
|
What is the measurement of the mind
(IQ or personality test) Limitations include: too few choices & too easy (measure of intelligence would be inaccurate as (many people would pass due to the fact it wasn't complex. participants might also guess what the researchers want them to say & if chance played too huge of a part in it)
Psychometric, and limitations addressed in the revised test
|