This person was convicted of violating the Espionage Act of 1917 by publishing anti-draft pamphlets.

This person was the fourth president of the United States.

This case explored limitations on the Free Speech Clause when the speech creates a clear and present danger.

This case led to progress in the legal protection of civil rights and especially desegregation.

“The right of one charged with crime to counsel may not be deemed fundamental and essential to fair trials in some countries, but it is in ours.”

This person was part of a group of students who decided to wear armbands in school in protest of the Vietnam War.

This city wanted to put restrictions on the right to bear arms.

This case reinforced protection of the Free Exercise Clause from state legislation.

This case determined that federal law had supremacy over state laws and that states could not interfere with federal powers.

“Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government...”

This person was one of five North Carolina residents concerned about the constitutionality of the 12th District.

This organization was created to protect elections against corruption.

This case affirmed that the Supremacy Clause denies Congress the ability to pass unconstitutional legislation.

This case established that all defendants have a right to legal counsel at both state and federal levels.

“We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place.”

This person was charged with breaking and entering but could not afford a lawyer for his defense and was denied one by the state of Florida.

This state wanted to put a tax on the National Bank.

This case established that the Necessary and Proper Clause allowed the federal government to override state legislation.

This case called for careful oversight of apportionment in which race is a factor.

“The possession of a gun in a local school zone is in no sense an economic activity that might, through repetition elsewhere, substantially affect any sort of interstate commerce.”

This organization wanted to publish a movie critical of Hillary Clinton without restrictions imposed by the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.

This person was arrested for carrying a gun into his high school.

This case strengthened the enforcement of the Equal Protection Clause.

This case decided that the right to bear arms cannot be controlled by the states.

“It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”