**Who was in the wrong in this situation?**
POLICE OFFICERS

**Who was in the wrong in this situation?**
FEMALE STUDENT; Students do have 4th Amendment rights at school, but they are balanced with the school’s responsibility to maintain a safe and educational environment.

**Who was wrong in this situation?**
WILLIAMS

**Who won the argument?**
THE ROBBER, GUY W/ THE PHONE; They said that the searching of the phone records without a warrant was a violation of the 4 because the phone has personal privacy to where the people could be and other personal information.

**Who was in the wrong in this situation?**
THE COP; The cop was in trouble for searching the stereo because it violated the 4 amendment.

**Who was in the wrong in this situation?**
PEOPLE SEARCHING SAVANA; The strip search by school officials in this case was not legal. It was unreasonable considering the nature of the offense and the facts of the case.

**Who was in the wrong in this situation?**
AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATION (ATA); The FAAA Act prohibits a state from enacting any regulation related to the "price, route, or service of any motor carrier." ATA claimed that the concession agreements amounted to such a regulation.

**Who was wrong in this situation?**
OSBORNE; evidence that he overheard the discussion, did not violate Osborn’s rights and recording was properly admitted as evidence.

**Who was wrong in this situation?**
UNITED STATES; Colony decides the case.

**Who was wrong in this situation?**
KUHLMEIER; the principal's deletion of the articles did not violate the students' rights under the First Amendment. The Amendment did not require schools to affirmatively promote particular types of student speech.

**Who was wrong in this situation?**
RIOS; He did not have a license to be operating the vehicle.

**Who was wrong in this situation?**
HAWKIN’S & PATTERSONS